Advertisement 1
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Mark Carney seems to embody change much better on stage than on paper
Author of the article:
By Chris Selley
Published Apr 21, 2025
4 minute read
Join the conversation
Article content
Releasing a detailed, costed platform is quite rightly seen as a basic obligation of a political campaign. You don’t necessarily need one to win, but if everyone has one other than you people certainly have a right to ask why you don’t. Every party claims to have a plan; surely they should at least be able to put it down on paper and have some basic idea of how much it will cost.
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
- Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
- Unlimited online access to National Post.
- National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
- Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
- Support local journalism.
SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE ARTICLES
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
- Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
- Unlimited online access to National Post.
- National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
- Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
- Support local journalism.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
- Access articles from across Canada with one account.
- Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
- Enjoy additional articles per month.
- Get email updates from your favourite authors.
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
- Access articles from across Canada with one account
- Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
- Enjoy additional articles per month
- Get email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account
or
View more offers
Article content
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Article content
All that said, the Liberals may well be worse off for releasing their platform over the weekend. Seeing Liberal Leader Mark Carney’s vision on paper, all in one place, is somehow more jarring than hearing it piecemeal. Even straight-up headlines like “Liberal platform promises $130 billion in new measures over four years, adding $225 billion to federal debt” (per the CBC), will likely not have landed well with Canadians looking to move on definitively from a decade of Trudeaunomics.
Article content
Platformed
This newsletter tackles hot topics with boldness, verve and wit. (Subscriber-exclusive edition on Fridays)
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.
Article content
When he’s at his best temperamentally, Carney is unflappable and doesn’t easily take offence. That was largely on display during both leaders’ debates last week (where Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre was also at his calmest). Carney had a couple of unfortunate arrogance eruptions earlier in the campaign, including reacting with incredulity that a reporter might suggest there could be conflicts of interest hidden somewhere in Brookfield Asset Management’s “over $1 trillion (U.S.) of assets under management” — Carney having been chair of the company until mid-January.
Article content
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
But generally he has presented himself — with remarkable success, according to polls at least — as a calm, intelligent, technocratic alternative to nine years of Justin Trudeau’s vacuous, thespian melodrama. When he talks about separating capital and operating spending, distinguishing “investing” from “spending,” you can almost believe it’s something more than accounting trick … until you see the costing and, well, either way it’s still debt.
Article content
Read More
- Liberals and Conservatives fighting for support from centrist voters, poll shows
- Carney and Poilievre are both Catholic. Here’s how they reacted to the Pope’s death
Advertisement embed-more-topic
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Carney promises to adjust spending as a percentage more toward capital projects and away from program spending, which few would oppose in principle, the latter having ballooned in recent years. And with “buy Canadian” being all the rage, I suspect most of us have nodded along with Carney (and other politicians) when he says we should use those capital projects to boost Canadian industry and create Canadian jobs.
Article content
But then you see it on paper: “We will prioritize Canadian contractors in our defence procurement (and) Crown corporations with major capital acquisitions, like Via Rail, will also be encouraged to meet this standard.”
Advertisement 1
This advertisement has not loaded yet.
Trending
- Federal ElectionConservatives promise over $70B in tax cuts and $34B in new spending, but no timeline for balanced budget
- CanadaCRA overpaid some Canadians in carbon tax payments and wants the money back. Here's how to know if that's you
- NP CommentTasha Kheiriddin: Poilievre's platform a direct challenge to Carney's boomer tome
- NP CommentSubscriber only. John Ivison: The Conservatives’ platform undermines their attacks on Liberal profligacy
Subscriber only
- Federal ElectionA record 7.3 million Canadians voted in advance polls
Advertisement 2
Advertisement
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Canadian military procurement isn’t a mess because Canadian shipyards can’t build ships; it’s a mess because military procurement hasn’t really been about military procurement for decades. Rather, it’s about having something to promise Canadian industry during each election cycle. But if we were suddenly dead serious about having a proper military in order to have a proper military,surely we would prioritize getting what we need over where it comes from. There are plenty of options other than the United States.
Article content
The bit about Via Rail is one of my favourite little details in the platform, and a fine example of how thoroughly Trudeau-esque this document is. Via’s biggest forthcoming capital acquisitions include new long-distance train sets for the company’s heavily subsidized cruise-ship-on-rails division. In 2023 taxpayers shelled out $1,015 per passenger on The Canadian, the route between Toronto and Vancouver, and it’s still a very expensive way to travel. It’s crying out for privatization.
Article content
But much bigger than that, should it come to pass, will be the Liberals’ back-of-a-napkin plan for high-frequency rail between Toronto and Quebec City, or maybe it’s high-speed rail, or maybe it’s a bit of both. Just tell them what you want to hear and they’ll say it for you. Indeed, out of nowhere, the Liberal platform extends the project westward from Toronto to Windsor! And it says that’ll just be the “start” of high-speed rail plans.
Article content
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Listen to Carney talk about government efficiency and you might think, well, if anyone knows a thing or two about that, it certainly ought to be him. But then you see the promise of finding a whopping $30 billion in savings across government, which is the sort of thing every party platform always promises, only it rarely pans out. And then you remember Carney has never actually led or been part of any government, and suddenly the promise looks just as suspect as always, if not more.
Article content
You look at Carney’s vague carbon-tax plan — big emitters will pay, and somehow consumers won’t — and you remember that Carney certainly supported the consumer carbon tax that he axed out of political expediency as one of his first order of prime ministerial business. You see the promise to “revoke gun licences for individuals convicted of violent offences,” which is already in the Criminal Code, and you realize that Carney is flying just as blind-and-happy as the Liberals always do on guns. You see the platform’s proposal to “allow for consecutive sentencing for serious and violent offences,” which Poilievre has been assailed for supporting, and you realize they’re the same beet-red hypocrites as ever.
Article content
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Search the platform for your own personal annoyances about Trudeau-era Liberal governance, and you’re unlikely to come up empty.
Article content
National Post
cselley@postmedia.com
Article content
Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers.Sign up here.
Article content
This advertisement has not loaded yet.
Get the latest from Chris Selley straight to your inbox
Comments
You must be logged in to join the discussion or read more comments.
Create an AccountSign in
Join the Conversation
Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.
